| PROPOSED
MEASURES: AGRICULTURAL PESTICIDES IN WATER |
Frequency of
pesticide occurrence in streams, groundwater, and fish in agricultural
areas. Detection of pesticides indicates that these chemicals are
not being fully broken down or contained within the farm system. (Figs.
1, 2)
An
ideal measure would address not simply the occurrence of pesticides,
but also the frequency with which they are found over established threshold
levels. However, such standards have been developed for only a fraction
of the pesticides found in water samples, and not for mixtures of different
compounds. Active research is ongoing in this area, and it will be monitored
for possible reference in future reports
Locations where
pesticides are found frequently or at high concentrations, as a
means of identifying areas where cropping practices, natural conditions,
or other factors result in export of larger quantities of chemicals.
(Figs. 3, 4)
Commonly detected
individual pesticides, as a means of identifying the most commonly
encountered chemicals. (Fig. 5)
Pesticides have
varying degrees of toxicity to fish, other animals, and humans, and
the presence of a pesticide does not imply that a health-based standard
has been exceeded.
In
agricultural areas, about 45 percent of the groundwater and more than
80 percent of the streams and fish sampled have detectable amounts of
at least one pesticide. Many samples contain mixtures of pesticides.
However, fish and stream samples in agricultural areas generally have
fewer pesticides than do those in urban or mixed-land-use areas, whereas
agricultural ground water have more. About 10 percent of streams in
all types of land uses have detectable amounts of 10 or more pesticides.
Two currently used
herbicides are found in more than half of the streams sampled in agricultural
areas.
No pesticide was
found in more than one-third of ground water samples.
Pesticides
in Surface & Ground Water (1)
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Source:
USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program
|
| These
graphs show the percentage of samples (vertical axis) in which different
numbers of pesticides were detected (horizontal axis). The lines
indicate that more samples contained one pesticide than had two
pesticides, and so on. For example, more than 95 percent of the
streams in urban and mixed-land-use areas contained at least one
pesticide, and only 10 percent had 10 or more pesticides. These
graphs show the amounts detectable using current screening methods.
For comparison, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency aquatic-life
criteria of 0.041 parts per billion (ppb) and 0.100 ppb have been
established for chlorpyrifos and malathion, respectively. |
Pesticides
in Shallow Groundwater in Agricultural Areas (3)
|
Pesticides
in Agricultural Streams (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program
|
| These
maps show the locations of ground water study areas and stream sampling
sites in agricultural areas. Areas are ranked according to whether
they had high, medium, or low concentrations of pesticides (the
index for streams) or more frequent detections relative to other
agricultural areas that were sampled (the index for groundwater) |
| FREQUENCY
OF DETECTION, COMMON PESTICIDES IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS: 1991-1996
(5) |
| Compound |
Streams |
Shallow
Ground Water |
| Herbicides |
|
|
Atrazine
|
66%
|
32% |
|
Deethlyatrazine
|
36% |
29% |
|
Metolachlor
|
53% |
8% |
|
Cyanazine
|
25% |
1% |
|
Simazine
|
45%
|
13%
|
| Insecticides |
| |
Diazinon
|
11% |
<1% |
|
Carbaryl
|
7% |
<1% |
|
Malathion
|
4% |
<1% |
|
Chlorpyrifos
|
10% |
<1% |
Notes:
Samples shown here are from areas indicated on the maps above.
All compounds are in current use, with the exception of deethylatrazine,
which is a breakdown product of atrazine.
|
| Source:
USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program |
|
STATUS
OF DATA & OTHER NOTES
|
|
|
The data
presented here are from the USGS National Water Quality Assessment
Program (NAWQA), which in the future will include more complete
coverage of water use and in the United States. Stream samples
are intended to represent common conditions during seasons with
significant runoff.
The fish
used in this analysis (carp and suckers) are not common food
fish, and the data on pesticide levels were not collected in
a manner that enables a direct comparison with human health-based
guidelines. However, USGS recommends further assessment of edible
species if there are active fisheries in streams where high
concentrations were found.
Please
see the Technical
Notes for additional information.
|
|