The Indicator
A deliberate choice was made to focus this indicator on unusual mortalities
rather than all marine mortalities. The latter includes death from old age,
predation, and human-related causes such as entanglement with fishing gear.
Unusual mortalities were selected so that only extraordinary instances of animal
deaths would be included; a death from old age is within normal functioning
of an ecosystem and should not be treated as a signal of changing ecosystem
status.
In response to a major dolphin die-off during 198788, the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) established a Working Group on Unusual Marine Mammal
Mortality Events (WGUMMME) to create criteria for determining when an unusual
mortality event is occurring and then to direct responses to such events (see
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Health_and_Stranding_Response_Program/WGUMMME.html).
The Working Group consists of a multidisciplinary team that makes judgments
based on the following: (1) there is an increased number of mortalities when
compared with historical data; (2) animals are stranding at an unusual time
of year; (3) strandings occur in a localized area, throughout the geographical
range, or they spread geographically with time; (4) the species, age, or sex
composition of the stranded animals is different from what is normally seen;
(5) stranded animals exhibit similar or unusual pathological findings or general
physical condition; (6) mortality is accompanied by abnormal behavior among
living individuals in the wild; and (7) critically endangered species are dying.
The Data
Data Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanographic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NMFS, Office of Protected Resources, Marine
Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program; and Dierauf and Gulland (2001).
Data Quality/Caveats: The data for 2001 are preliminary as these unusual
mortality events (UMEs) have not been officially closed and the total number
of affected animals tallied. Also, there was a single UME for gray whales that
spanned three years (19992001). A total of 678 animals were lost to a
UME, with 273 in 1999. NOAA has not yet finalized the accounting for this event,
so the remainder was simply split between 2000 and 2001. Given that there is
no apparent trend to the data, this gross simplification should not distort
the interpretation of this indicator.
Data Access: The 2001 data for two UMEs and the total number of gray
whales lost in the 19992001 UME were obtained directly from NMFS. All
other UME data were obtained from Dierauf and Gulland (2001).
The Data Gap
There is no program for sea birds, fish, and shellfish similar to that in place
for marine mammals run under the auspices of the WGUMMME. It will be necessary
to establish guidelines for what constitutes a UME for these animals, which
typically perish in much larger numbers than mammals. For example, a guideline
for fish may be that 1,000 deaths of members of two or three species would be
necessary to qualify for a UME. This guideline may vary by species and by location
and will certainly be different from the guidelines appropriate for shellfish
and sea birds. Because these UMEs would all involve large numbers of animals,
only the number of events will be reported. In addition, it is unclear if data
exist on UMEs for sea turtles; however, these mortalities would be reported
by the number of animals lost as is done for mammals.
References
Dierauf, L.A., and F.M.D. Gulland, eds. 2001. CRC handbook of marine mammal
medicine: Health, disease, and rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press,
Inc.
|