|
What Is This Indicator, and Why Is It Important?
This indicator reports on the relative risk of extinction
of native forest species. The risk categories are based on
such factors as the number and condition of individuals and
populations, the area occupied by the species, population
trends, and known threats. Degrees of risk reported here range
from very high (critically imperiled species are
often found in five or fewer places or have experienced very
steep declines) to moderate (vulnerable species
are often found in fewer than 80 places or have recently experienced
widespread declines). In all cases, a wide variety of factors
contribute to the overall ratings. Forest species
live in forests during at least part of their life and depend
on forest habitats for survival.
Species are valued for a variety of reasons: they provide
products, including food, fiber, and, more recently, genetic
materials; they are key elements of ecosystems, which themselves
provide valuable goods and services; and many people value
them for their intrinsic worth or beauty.
What Do the Data Show? About 3.5% of native
forest animal species are critically imperiled, about 5% are
imperiled, and 1.5% are or may be extinct. When vulnerable
species (9%) are counted, a total of about 20% of forest animals
are considered to be at risk. Hawaii
has a much larger percentage of at-risk forest species than
any other region.
Interpreting these figures is complicated, however, because
some species are naturally rare. Thus, the rankings are influenced
by differences among regions and species groups in the number
of naturally rare species, as well as by different types and
levels of human activities that can cause species declines.
Interpretation of these data will be greatly enhanced when
information on population trends for these at-risk species
becomes available.
Why Can't This Entire Indicator Be Reported at This
Time? This indicator reports on mammals, birds, reptiles,
amphibians, grasshoppers, and butterflies. Data on other groups
have not been included either because too little is known
to assign risk categories or, as with most plants, because
determinations of which species are associated with forests,
grasslands, or other habitats have not been completed.
See also the national
at-risk species indicator and the indicators for at-risk
coastal, freshwater,
and grassland and shrubland
species, as well as the indicators for species
in farmlands and urban
and suburban areas.
|