|
Note: This serves as the technical note for the Grassland/Shrubland fire
frequency indicator.
The Data
The USDA Forest Service has an active program of research into fire and fuels
management, including development of tools for assessing fire risk due to changes
in fire frequency. In particular, the Fire Regimes for Fuels Management and
Fire Use project, which began in 1997, involves mapping and characterization
of presettlement natural fire regimes and current vegetation conditions and
development of an index of departure for use in national- level fire management
planning.
As part of this program, the Forest Service has developed estimates of presettlement
fire frequency, using biophysical information, preexisting remote-sensing products,
and expert knowledge about disturbance and successional processes and developed
stylized successional pathways for unique combinations of presettlement fire
regime and potential natural vegetation. These estimates can be found at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fuelman/firereg.htm.
Additional information on this procedure may be found in Schmidt et al. (in
press).
However, historic fire return intervals, based on tree ring scars and similar
site measurements, have not been determined for the majority of the United States.
The research project described above has developed estimates of fire return
intervals by inference from existing vegetation. Essentially this involves assumptions
about the fire return interval required to permit a certain vegetation type
to develop. While these are valuable estimates, they are based on a significant
amount of expert knowledge and modeling, rather than being relatively direct
measurements of fire return frequency, and thus were not appropriate for inclusion
in this report.
References
Cissel, J.H., F.J. Swanson, and P.J. Weisburg. 1999. Landscape management using
historical fire regimes: Blue River, Oregon. Ecological Applications 9:12171231.
Knapp, P.A. 1997. Spatial characteristics of regional wildfire frequencies
in intermountain west grass-dominated communities. Professional Geographer 49:3951.
Knapp, A.K., J.M. Briggs, D.C. Hartnett, and S.C. Collins, eds. 2000. Grassland
dynamics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Sauer, C.O. 1950. Grassland climax,
fire and man. Journal of Range Management 3:1621.
Schmidt, K.M., J.P. Menakis, C.C. Hardy, D.L. Bunnell, N. Sampson, J. Cohen,
and L. Bradshaw. In press. Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland
fire and fuel management. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR- CD-XXX. Ogden,
UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research
Station.
Swanson, F.J., J.A. Jones, D.O. Wallin, and J.H. Cissel. 1993. Natural variabilityimplications
for ecosystem management. In M.E. Jensen and P.S. Bourgeron (eds.), Eastside
Forest Ecosystem Health Assessment. Vol. II: Ecosystem management: Principles
and applications. Portland OR: U.S. Forest Service.
Wallin, D.O., F.J. Swanson, and B. Marks. 1994. Landscape pattern response
to changes in pattern generalization rules: Land use legacies in forestry. Ecological
Applications 4:569580.
|