|
What Is This Indicator, and Why Is It Important?
The indicator tracks the frequency and duration of zero-flow
conditions for streams and rivers in grassland/shrubland regions.
It reports the percentage of streams and rivers that have
at least one no-flow day per year, and the percentage where
the duration of zero-flow periods for a given period is substantially
longer or shorter than the long-term average.
Stream flow is the lifeblood of uncountable plant and animal
species, as well as a major source of water for agricultural,
municipal, and other uses. Changes in stream flow can affect
plants and animals accustomed to particular levels of flow.
No-flow periods may lead to a loss of fish and aquatic animals
(although some will survive short periods of zero flow in
pools). Depending on the length of the no-flow period, streamside
vegetation and the wildlife habitat it provides will gradually
be lost. In other cases, the absence of a no-flow period (as
in regulated flow below a dam) may also lead to shifts in
the animals and plants living in and around streams and rivers.
Some no-flow periods occur naturally. Others occur because
of increased water use for domestic, irrigation, or other
purposes, or because of changes in land use (e.g., grazing
or development) or vegetation that modify the flow of surface
water and the recharge of groundwater (e.g., expansion of
deep-rooted vegetation such as pinion-juniper woodlands can
draw down surface aquifers). No-flow periods may also be due
to changing weather or climate, such as the longer periods
of drought in recent decades (e.g., mid-1970s), while return
of yearround flows may coincide with wet periods (e.g., mid-1980s).
What Do the Data Show? The percentage of
streams with no-flow periods has decreased in all grassland/shrubland
regions of the West. The 1950s and 1960s showed similar percentages
of no-flow, while the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s recorded noticeably
lower percentages. During the relatively wet 1980s, both the
California/Mountain and the Desert/Shrub ecoregions had a
noticeably lower percentage of streams and rivers with no-flow
periods, although the California/Mountain region consistently
has the highest percentage of no-flow streams. The number
of streams and rivers with longer than average zero-flow periods
decreased in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, compared to the
1950s and 1960s.
|