|
What Is This Indicator, and Why Is It Important?
This indicator reports on the status of native grassland and
shrubland species with respect to their relative risk of
extinction. These status ranks are based on multiple factors:
the number and condition of individuals and populations, the
area occupied by the species, population trends, and known
threats. Degrees of risk reported here range from very high
(critically imperiled species often are found
in five or fewer places or have experienced very steep declines)
to moderate (vulnerable species often are found
in fewer than 80 places or have recently experienced widespread
declines). In all cases, a wide variety of factors contribute
to overall ratings. Grassland and shrubland species
live in these habitats during at least part of their life
cycle and depend on them for survival.
Species are valued for a variety of reasons: they provide
valuable products, including food, fiber, and, more recently,
genetic materials; they are key elements of ecosystems, which
themselves provide valuable goods and services; and many people
value them for their intrinsic worth.
Why Can't This Entire Indicator Be Reported ?
This indicator reports on mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians,
grasshoppers, and butterflies. Data on other groups have not
been included either because too little is known to assign
to risk categories or, as with most plants, because determinations
as to which are associated with forests, or grasslands, or
other habitats has not been completed.
What Do the Data Show? About 3.5% of native
grassland/shrubland animal species are critically imperiled,
6% are imperiled, and 0.5% are or may be extinct. When vulnerable
species (7%) are counted, about 17% of grassland/shrubland
animal species are considered at risk. Hawaii
has a much larger percentage of at-risk grassland and shrubland
species than any other region. Interpreting these figures
is complicated, however, because some species are naturally
rare. Thus, the rankings are influenced by differences in
the number of naturally rare species among regions and species
groups as well as different types and levels of human activities
that can cause species declines. Interpretation of these data
will be greatly enhanced when it is possible to present information
on population trends for these at-risk species.
See also the national at-risk
species indicator, plus those for coastal,
forest, and freshwater
species, and for species in farmland
and urban/suburban areas.
|