The Indicator
This indicator reports the change in population of invasive and native, non-invasive
grassland/shrubland birds. The invasive birds include both non-native
birds and some native birds that spread aggressively because of
a favorable change in conditions. The non-invasive birds are native
birds that depend on high-quality native grasslands and shrublands.
There was some interest in separating the groups of this indicator
by native/non-native; however, given the low number of birds involved,
a decision was made to maximize the number of species in each group
to improve the statistical reliability of the results. Thus, both
natives and non-natives were included in the invasive category.
The Data
Data Source: This indicator incorporates population trend estimates
for 15 invasive non-native and 35 native grassland bird species. Estimates are
based on data collected for the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS), and
were obtained from the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center (PWRC), United States
Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior. Trends were estimated for
BBS Physiographic Strata (regions) 68, 3256 and 8091, in seven
5-year intervals from 1966 to 2000 (http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/physio.html).
Following is a list of the invasive species included in this indicator and
the reason the species is considered invasive: American crow, habitat conversion
to agriculture; American robin, habitat fragmentation due to suburban development;
black-billed magpie, habitat conversion and fragmentation; bronzed cowbird,
forage in association with livestock; brown-headed cowbird, forage in association
with livestock; cattle egret, Old World native, habitat conversion to agriculture,
and forage in association with livestock; common grackle, habitat fragmentation
and conversion to agriculture; European starling, Old World native; gray partridge,
Old World native, habitat conversion to agriculture; great-tailed grackle, habitat
conversion to agriculture; house finch, habitat fragmentation due to suburban
development; house sparrow, Old World native; mourning dove, habitat conversion
and fragmentation; ring-necked pheasant, Old World native, habitat conversion
to agriculture; and rock dove (domestic pigeon), Old World native, habitat conversion,
and fragmentation.
Native, non-invasive species, which are restricted to those native species
known to be dependent upon relatively intact and high-quality native grasslands
and shrublands, included Bairds sparrow, black-throated sparrow, LeContes
sparrow, bobolink, loggerhead shrike, Brewers sparrow, long-billed curlew,
burrowing owl, McCowns longspur, Cassins sparrow, mountain plover,
chestnut-collared longspur, northern harrier, common nighthawk, prairie falcon,
dickcissel, sage grouse, eastern meadowlark, sage sparrow, ferruginous hawk,
sage thrasher, golden eagle, savannah sparrow, grasshopper sparrow, sharp-tailed
grouse, greater prairie chicken, Spragues pipit, Henslows sparrow,
Swainsons hawk, horned lark, upland sandpiper, lark bunting, vesper sparrow,
lark sparrow, and western meadowlark.
Data Collection Methodology: The BBS is jointly coordinated by the PWRC
and the Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada. It is conducted along
randomly located routes on secondary roads throughout the contiguous United
States and southern Canada. Routes are 24.5 miles long, with 50 survey points
at 0.5-mile intervals. Observers survey each route annually during June (May
in some southern states and desert areas). At each survey point, the observer
counts all birds seen or heard within a 0.25-mile radius during a 3-minute census.
The first BBS routes in 1966 were run only east of the Mississippi River. The
BBS was extended to the central United States in 1967, with full coverage of
the contiguous United States by 1968. The number of BBS routes has increased
over time, so recent years provide more comprehensive data than early years.
Summaries of the BBS methodology are provided by Peterjohn and Sauer (1993)
and Sauer et al. (2000a,b), and a review of the program is provided by OConnor,
et al (2000).
Data Manipulation: W. Mark Roberts, an independent researcher, obtained
trend estimates (change in population size as a percentage per year) for each
species in each physiographic stratum (region) and time interval from a server
program provided by John R. Sauer at PWRC (http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/trend/tfmb.html).
The program uses an estimating equations estimator (described in
Link and Sauer 1994) to calculate each stratums trend estimate from individual
route data. Dr. Roberts performed subsequent manipulations: To reduce the influence
of less reliable estimates, each stratum estimate was weighted toward the survey-wide
estimate, proportionately to the variances of both estimates. Weighting used
an empirical-Bayes formula (Equation 1 in Link and Sauer 1996). The mean of
the variance-weighted stratum estimates was calculated for each species and
time interval. The summary indicator is the proportion of species with positive
(increasing) mean variance-weighted estimates. To compare native with invasive
birds, Yates-corrected Chi-square statistical tests were performed on the frequencies
of positive and negative mean variance-weighted estimates.
Data Quality/Caveats: Bird species differ in habits, habitat, abundance,
and range, all factors that may bias trend estimates for certain
species more than for others (see Droege 1990 and http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/introbbs.html).
The BBS methodology and data have been subjected to peer review,
results of which are available at http://www.mp2-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbsreview/.
The trend analysis program (Sauer and Hines 2001) and manipulations
performed by Dr. Roberts are based on peer-reviewed methodology.
Output of these manipulations has not, however, been independently
verified.
Data Access: Trend estimates are the output of a draft program
(http://www.mbr-wrc.usgs.gov/bbs/trend/tfmb.html),
placed on the PWRC server but not linked to public pages. Though
accessible without charge, this program should not be used without
permission from John R. Sauer at PWRC.
References
Droege, S. 1990. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, pp. 1-4. In J.R.
Sauer and S. Droege (eds.), Survey designs and statistical methods for the estimation
of avian population trends. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report
90(1).
Link, W.A., and J.R. Sauer. 1994. Estimating equations estimates of trends.
Bird Populations 2:2332. Link, W.A., and J.R. Sauer. 1996. Extremes in
ecology: Avoiding the misleading effects of sampling variation in summary analyses.
Ecology 77(5):16331640.
OConnor, R.J., E. Dunn, D.H. Johnson, S.L. Jones, D. Petit, K. Pollock,
C.R. Smith, J.L. Trapp, and E. Welling. 2000. A programmatic review of the North
American Breeding Bird Survey: Report of a peer review panel to USGS Patuxent
Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. http://www.mp2-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbsreview/.
Peterjohn, B.G., and J.R. Sauer. 1993. North American Breeding Bird Survey
annual summary 1990-1991. Bird Populations 1:115.
Sauer, J.R., and J.E. Hines. 2001. Trend analysis form: Draft version.
Version 2001.00, 2 April 2001 DRAFT, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research
Center, Laurel, MD. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/trend/tfmb.html.
Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, I. Thomas, J. Fallon, and G. Gough. 2000a. Details
of the BBS. In The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis
19661999. Version 98.1, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel,
MD. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/introbbs.html.
Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, I. Thomas, J. Fallon, and G. Gough. 2000b. General
introductionBBS. In The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and
analysis 19661999. Version 98.1, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center,
Laurel, MD. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/genintro.html.
|