|
What Is This Indicator, and Why Is It Important?
This indicator reports on contaminants found in urban and
suburban streams and soils. The graph on the top reports the
average number of contaminants detected throughout the year
at urban and suburban stream sites, and the middle graph reports
the percentage of stream sites with concentrations of chemical
contaminants that exceeded standards or guidelines for the
protection of human health or aquatic life. Compounds reported
here include many pesticides, selected pesticide breakdown
products, ammonia, and nitrate (because nitrate and ammonia
occur naturally, they are not included in the graphs showing
contaminant occurrence).
In sufficient quantities, contaminants such as pesticides
can harm people as well as fish and other wildlife. The number
of contaminants detected is important, but the presence of
pesticides does not necessarily mean that the levels are high
enough to cause problems. Comparison with standards and guidelines
(benchmarks) provides a useful reference to help judge the
significance of contamination.
However, appropriate benchmarks do not exist for many compounds:
for example, there are no drinking water benchmarks for 33
of the 76 pesticides analyzed here and no aquatic life benchmarks
for 48 of the 76. Current benchmarks do not account for mixtures
of chemicals or seasonal pulses of high concentrations. In
addition, potential effects on the reproductive, nervous,
and immune systems, as well as on particularly sensitive individuals,
are not yet well understood.
Why Can't This Entire Indicator Be Reported at This
Time? Data are not currently available to report
in a consistent manner on chemical contamination in urban
and suburban soils.
What Do the Data Show? About 85% of stream
sites in urban and suburban areas had an average of at least
five detectable contaminants throughout the year. All sites
had at least one chemical that exceeded guidelines for protection
of aquatic life, and about 5% of sites had a contaminant that
exceeded human health standards or guidelines.
Discussion The data shown here do not represent
assessments of the risks posed to people or ecosystems in
any specific location, since they do not incorporate factors
such as whether the water tested is actually used as a drinking
water source or whether aquatic animals are biologically active
at the time of year when the contaminants are found.
Guidelines for the protection of aquatic life are often numerically
lower than similar benchmarks for human health. Aquatic animals
spend much or all of their life in water and may be more sensitive
to specific contaminants.
See also the national,
coastal, and farmland
contaminants indicators.
|